Comments on: China Takes First Step Towards Ending Animal Testing https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/ making cruelty-free beauty easy Sat, 20 Aug 2016 04:12:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5 By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-291210 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 17:14:15 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-291210 In reply to Cathy.

Hi Cathy,

Sorry for the late reply here. I must have missed this comment. Only brands who manufacture some ordinary cosmetics and sell them only in China are able to avoid animal testing. If they sell their products in other markets outside of China, they are not able to bypass testing.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-289327 Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:17:01 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-289327 In reply to Stephanie.

Some items sold online don’t need to be tested on animals, but items physically sold there do. With L’Oreal, for example, they are registered as a business in China. So no matter how the products are bought, animal testing is being conducted. You may want to read the following post to help explain – Are Items Imported into China Tested on Animals?

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-287462 Sun, 09 Aug 2015 03:39:41 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-287462 In reply to Cathy.

Hi Cathy!

This is a great question. First off, the brand is incorrect that China no longer requires animal testing. While they have taken steps to reduce animal testing, it is still required in most situations. About shipping into China, this can occur in rare occasions without animal testing. You can read more about that here – Are Items Imported Into China Tested on Animals? I hope this helps!

]]>
By: Cathy https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-286254 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 04:15:31 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-286254 Hi Tashina,

Thank you for your research! I have a question though.
Do you know what this means for companies that produce ordinary cosmetics only, manufacture their products in China, but also export them to other countries?

I got a reply from one brand that they sell in China, but aren’t required to do animal testing because they’re also manufactured there. However they’re sold in other countries as well.

I would appreciate any insight on the topic. Chinese law is super confusing.

]]>
By: Stephanie https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-285652 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:00:38 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-285652 So is it true that items imported (like L’Oreal) and sold on shelves in China are required to be animal tested, but the same items sold online don’t require animal testing?? That is so strange to me! Everything should only be sold online then!

]]>
By: Cathy https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-285505 Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:38:16 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-285505 Hi Tashina,
I was wondering if you could clarify something for me. One brand I contacted with questions responded that their products and ingredients are never tested on animals either by them or by third party and that they make sure that their suppliers have the same policy. They didn’t mention the “except when required by law”. However when asked about China, this is what they said: “We do ship to China and China no longer requires animal testing on cosmetics.”

Could you help me figure out what that means for that brand? Am I right in assuming that cosmetics shipped to China but not sold there at a physical retailer do not need to be tested? Or is the brand lying to me? I will clarify if they have any physical retailers/distributors in China, but I’m still unclear about the laws when shipping from an online store.

I’ll appreciate if you can help with any information that you have on the topic!

Thank you for your time!

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-284016 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:30:59 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-284016 In reply to redtearsblackwings.

I think confusing as possible is definitely the correct term for it! haha

]]>
By: redtearsblackwings https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-283341 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:08:19 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-283341 It might be a step in the right direction but it still sounds like China doesn’t really trust alternative testing methods despite the large majority of other countries who use these methods. Plus they seem to have made it as confusing as possible.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268885 Sat, 26 Jul 2014 01:15:00 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268885 In reply to Carol Richards.

Hi Carol,

This law won’t change anything for international brands. At this time, it only effects certain products that are being made and sold in China by non-international brands. I hope this helps to clarify.

]]>
By: Carol Richards https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268775 Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:27:46 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268775 Thank you for posting this. What does this mean for Laura Mercier? Will they still have to test on animals? I’m still a little unclear.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268699 Sun, 13 Jul 2014 14:16:44 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268699 In reply to Elena.

Hi Elena,

MAC does still test on animals, as do many large brands. The EU ban on animal testing was not a full ban in the sense that just because a brand is sold in the EU does not mean that it is cruelty free. The EU ban did not effect brands who test on animals outside of the EU, as required by law, etc. You may want to read this post to give you more information – What Does the EU Ban on Animal Testing Mean for Brands Selling Where Testing is Required by Law?

]]>
By: Elena https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268627 Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:11:53 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268627 Is still mac testing on animals? I feel i bit confused caused i live in europe and there is a law that forbides animal testin. So any profuct entenig europe must be cruelty free?

]]>
By: Sissi https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268484 Thu, 03 Jul 2014 01:43:57 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268484 Well, at least a step in the right direction! Thank you for sharing, Tashina!!!

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268453 Wed, 02 Jul 2014 03:31:22 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268453 In reply to Emily.

Several animal organizations are speaking with various animal organizations there. It’s unclear to me who weighs in on their decision making process though.

]]>
By: Emily https://logicalharmony.net/china-takes-first-step-towards-ending-animal-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-268445 Tue, 01 Jul 2014 23:27:58 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=14930#comment-268445 Who is responsible for talking to the Chinese government about the possibility of changing their animal testing requirements?

]]>