Comments on: NYC Cosmetics is Not Cruelty Free https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/ making cruelty-free beauty easy Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:42:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5 By: Carla N. https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-1/#comment-314618 Mon, 11 Jun 2018 21:42:57 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-314618 In reply to Tashina.

I hear you, Debbie.
I was a die-hard MAChead until MAC entered the Chinese market.
Then I dropped them like 1 15-pound mealworm.
There are so many great alternatives out there: e.l.f., Makeup Geek, Kiko, Milani, Palladio, Pacifica, Gabriel, Yaby, Anastasia Beverly Hills, and others.

]]>
By: Cat https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-293314 Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:50:55 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-293314 What is the Email for NYC?

]]>
By: Sarah https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-293297 Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:58:39 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-293297 In reply to Lyn.

My cousin works with Starbucks and being fairly high up, she has to know everything about production. All Starbucks coffee is organic. However, it costs extra money to have the official Organic label. Perhaps its the same for the bunny?

]]>
By: Maura https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-292646 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:18:42 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-292646 In reply to Amberr Lunar.

They said that initially to convince you that they do not test, anytime a company mentions “when required by law” that means they test because it is not required by law in anywhere except china and if they sell there, which apparently they do, then they have to test. If they do not test, they wouldnt have mentioned this.

]]>
By: Mochizuki https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-288894 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:10 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-288894 In reply to Lyn.

To be honest, if I was in the cosmetics company, I wouldn’t want a bunny logo on my products whatsoever regardless of whether or not I was cruelty-free. I think some companies just don’t care for it as much as some people don’t care for it. But that’s just my opinion.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285220 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 05:28:30 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285220 In reply to Amberr Lunar.

Hi Amberr,

The reply states that testing may occur when required by law. “Before we place a product on the market, we assess it thoroughly to ensure that it is safe for human use and for the environment and that it is compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.”

Coty and NYC have since updated the animal testing stance to also say, “The only exceptions are the very few countries where, by law, the regulatory authorities require us to submit our products or ingredients to them for testing on animals as a mandatory part of their regulatory protocols in compliance with their local regulations.”. I just added the updated animal testing policy here.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285219 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 05:28:08 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285219 In reply to Anna.

Brands have to submit themselves to be certified by Leaping Bunny, so it’s something that needs to be a priority to the brand. Unless they have tried to be certified and were not able to meet their standards, Leaping Bunny would not be able to state why the brand isn’t certified.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285218 Mon, 06 Apr 2015 05:26:57 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285218 In reply to Anna.

The reply states that testing may occur when required by law. “Before we place a product on the market, we assess it thoroughly to ensure that it is safe for human use and for the environment and that it is compliant with all applicable laws, rules and regulations.”

Coty and NYC have since updated the animal testing stance to also say, “The only exceptions are the very few countries where, by law, the regulatory authorities require us to submit our products or ingredients to them for testing on animals as a mandatory part of their regulatory protocols in compliance with their local regulations.”. I just added the updated animal testing policy here.

]]>
By: Amberr Lunar https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285210 Sun, 05 Apr 2015 10:54:25 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285210 “We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients.”

This seems like a pretty clear answer to me?

]]>
By: Anna https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285123 Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:59:01 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285123 In reply to Lyn.

That I agree with… it seems strange. Maybe a helpful way to investigate the issue would be to ask the leaping bunny people why the company isn’t certified?

]]>
By: Anna https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-285122 Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:56:56 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-285122 I don’t understand what you mean. They say it here:

We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients.

The quote is from the email quoted in your post (emphasis mine). What else should they say to make it 100% clear that they don’t test on animals at all?

]]>
By: Lyn https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-2/#comment-284023 Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:16:35 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-284023 It’s strange that if a company was truely cruelty free, then why wouldn’t they want a bunny logo on their products?

]]>
By: Debbie Wilce https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-1/#comment-279417 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:30:07 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-279417 Hi. I did a little research myself and they appear to sell their brand in China, I take this to mean that they are against animal testing etc etc unless other required by law!!

If I am wrong please can someone correct me!! I’ve found some of the brands I USED to use say that they are cruelty free but then they also sell in China. If thats the case they aren’t cruelty free.

]]>
By: Tashina https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-1/#comment-266711 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:25:15 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-266711 In reply to mars.

Thank you! I agree – the small details of what brands avoid answering are often very telling.

]]>
By: mars https://logicalharmony.net/nyc-cosmetics-is-not-cruelty-free/comment-page-1/#comment-266709 Thu, 27 Feb 2014 15:23:14 +0000 http://logicalharmony.net/?p=9466#comment-266709 In reply to Ashley.

Yes they say that they do not commission a third party to test ingredients or products, but they shadily ducked the question as to whether they sell in China and whether they buy ingredients tested on animals as Coty is known to do. I think Logical Harmony interpretted the response BETTER than they expect their average customer to do by catching that tiny detail most would have missed. If they are buying ingredients tested on animals they are most certainly not cruelty free. and refusing to answer that question or clarifying…if they were cruelty free, a simple reply saying no we dont buy animal tested ingredients either would be easy to send. Silence speaks in this case and needs people like LH to interpret between the lines.

]]>