Comments on: Does Unilever Own Hourglass Cosmetics? https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/ making cruelty-free beauty easy Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:08:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.5 By: Susan Goss-Clements https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-369101 Tue, 16 Mar 2021 07:08:48 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-369101 I’m so disappointed to hear Hourglass is now owned by Unilever. – the values of each company are entirely opposing.

I won’t buy from any Unilever company, knowing their cruel and unnecessary animal testing practices. It wouldn’t sit well with me to put any money into their coffers.

As a huge conglomerate it makes business sense for Unilever to get into the fast growing vegan sector and I suppose if a multi-million pound deal is offered to a private individual for their business, it may be hard to resist. But what about the ethics in all this? Basically when a vegan, cruelty-free organisation sells out to one which conducts appalling experiments on animals, ethics or integrity haven’t been a factor.

I will be looking for a totally cruelty-free company to supply my cosmetics now.

]]>
By: L. https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304850 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:04:29 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304850 I’m always sad to hear such news. That said, “luckily” (such a bad/sad word to use here…) this change will not affect me, as Hourglass was never available around here, and thus I have never tried any of their products and won’t know what I was missing.

Or what I will be missing, because after this I will not seek to try out their products. I do agree with Tashina’s statement on that buying from a CF company with a non-CF parent is still much better than buying non-CF, and I would never judge or bash anyone for doing so (I just can’t understand the negativity going on in communities around this topic… why can’t people just be supportive of those who share the same basics of thinking and living? Or at least polite, should others’ PoVs not match theirs completely… even if you don’t agree with others’ personal “purchase rules”, pointing fingers and blaming others is just pointless and saddening. Especially in a “community” where, as Kim said above, perfection is pretty much impossible. Everyone draws their own borderlines between what still make them more happy than uncomfortable), but I personally do not wish to support CF companies with a non-CF parent, and will always seek other CF-alternatives first. The reason for this is that it just makes me very, very sad that while these companies claim that animal rights are important to them, it seems, apparently, that money is more important, as it proves to be enough for them to give in to another company who does not share the same ideology. There of course may very well be other factors we are not made aware of that result in such a decision, but still… luckily we’ve seen several examples of such acquisitions not going through/getting refused, so while this is becoming an usual pattern with brands recently, it is definitely not the only way. Let’s hope more and more companies will refuse to follow this pattern in the future (or less of them will get in a situation where they need to consider this in order to keep going).

]]>
By: Hazel Jones https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304837 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:56:17 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304837 Buying from a C/F company which parent company is not is an issue I’ve been thinking a lot about. I use to use Estée Lauder until they started testing in animals again (all for the Chinese market) but they are the parent company of Jo Malone which I have now stopped buying. Another is Penhaligons whose products I use to buy but they have been taken over by a non C/F company. The same with Superdrug. All the companies say they are still C/F but any profits they make will go into the coffers of the parent company which could be used for testing. It’s a problem big time for me.

]]>
By: Erin https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304826 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:28:27 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304826 In reply to Evelyn Silva.

I haven’t found anything in the way of a petition so far, but that could change. Also, Burt’s Bees is owned by Clorox. I believe the Hourglass acquisition is Unilever’s first time buying a makeup brand.

]]>
By: Tashina Combs https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304825 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:27:42 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304825 In reply to Andrea.

I think any steps towards cruelty-free are making a difference and are great. Don’t get discouraged! I think it’s so great you made the change and figured out a way for it to work for you instead of not making any change at all.

]]>
By: Andrea https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304824 Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:23:23 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304824 In reply to Kim.

Hi Kim! I just wanted to leave a comment saying I absolutely agree with your statement. I recently decided to go cruelty-free and I’ve gotten a lot of angry and judgmental comments from people who only buy from companies with cruelty-free parent companies. I think that’s great if you choose to support cruelty-free companies with cruelty-free parent companies, but it is a personal choice. It’s frustrating to be spreading an important message like going cruelty-free and only receive backlash and negative feedback from those who think you need to be doing better. I would absolutely love to live in a world where all cruelty-free companies are independent or owned by cruelty-free parents companies. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Right now, I believe that buying from cruelty-free companies that are owned by parent companies that are not cruelty-free is absolutely better than supporting companies that test on animals. I think people should be excited that so many people are even considering this route, instead of constantly lashing out and saying that it’s not good enough. So, I just wanted to say that I appreciate your comment. To Tashina, I appreciate your website more than you know! It has helped me so much on my journey to cruelty-free beauty.

]]>
By: Tonya Thompson https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304817 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:42:58 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304817 In reply to Kelly Jean.

Very well said. I have maybe 2 Hourglass products since I started my CF journey. #movingon 🙁

]]>
By: Evelyn Silva https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304815 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 23:01:52 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304815 Is there a petition going around about this potential acquisition and if so, can someone post the link please? My guess if we can consolidate all our comments and concerns it may have a greater impact. I wholeheartedly will not support a parent company that practices cruelty to animals which is why I have had to walk away from the Origins brand (once I discovered they were owned by Estée Lauder) and Burts Bees (unilever I believe). I will be super peeved, but I won’t hesitate to walk away from Hourglass as well. Ugh.

]]>
By: Taylor https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304814 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:44:33 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304814 Ugh! Vanish is my HG foundation! Guess I’ll be stocking up before the sale goes through!

]]>
By: Kelly Jean https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304811 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:55:01 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304811 I’m SO disappointed. The Hourglass liquid powder foundation and concealer were my holy grails since they matched my skin tone perfectly. So now my hunt begins for something else. I will use up what I have and that will be it for me and Hourglass. At this rate, I can only guess it’s just a matter of time before all of the big brands carried by Sephora and Ulta will be parented by a company that is not cruelty free. Unilever will not be getting a penny of my money as they are a big offender of cruel practices against animals. I’ll figure out a way to make my own cosmetics if it comes down to it. Such a shame that companies sell out to big brands that don’t share their morals. Hourglass is a successful company so I can only assume it came down to money. My issue isn’t a company maintaining a cruelty free status, it’s those big brands getting the dollars, controlling what these companies do and where they sell. I’m very saddened by this but there are plenty of other brands out there that fit my definition of cruelty free but the foundation issue I have being a brown, vegan girl, well that’s just rough…

]]>
By: Kim https://logicalharmony.net/does-unilever-own-hourglass-cosmetics/comment-page-1/#comment-304810 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:42:00 +0000 https://logicalharmony.net/?p=40432#comment-304810 I saw this coming. It always seemed strange to me that a high end line like Hourglass was an independent company. I personally do support cruelty free companies with non-CF parent companies simply because I don’t understand where one draws the line with the logic of “money going to the non-CF parent company”…for example, people will buy vegan products from a line that is not completely vegan. Doesn’t that constitute as giving money to non-CF practices? Or shopping at Sephora, who as a brand/company is not CF but obviously sell CF products–how is that different? I think it’s important to support companies who maintain their CF status because at a certain point it begins to feel a bit idealistic. Being vegan/CF is about trying your best; perfection is impossible. And of course Logical Harmony is a great resource for all consumers, regardless of stances on parent companies, but there generally is a lot of judgment towards people who buy things from companies with non-CF parent companies. I believe that accessibility is important and we shouldn’t shame people who buy something from companies like Tarte or Urban Decay. It’s important to show that there is a demand for CF products–this is precisely why bigger parent companies buy out smaller companies, so it would be unwise of them to change any practices that may be attributed to their success in the first place. And like Tashina said, it’s better than not buying something CF at all. So as long as individual brands maintain their cruelty free status, I will support them. I would love to hear other opinions about this and why people support not 100% vegan lines or shop at stores that aren’t 100% CF. Is there something I’m missing?

]]>